AnnotatedBibliographyRubricWeek2.pdf

1/10/23, 3:35 PMAnnotated Bibliography Rubric

Page 1 of 3https://lmscontent.embane…_Bibliography_Rubric.html

Annotated Bibliography RubricNote: An appropriate scholarly resource for this assignment is a current (within five years) evidence-based practice article from a peer-reviewed journal. Review assignment instructions for any additionalrequirements such as number of annotations to include.

Annotated Bibliography Rubric – 100 Points

Criteria ExemplaryExceeds

Expectations

AdvancedMeets

Expectations

IntermediateNeeds

Improvement

NoviceInadequate

TotalPoints

IdentifiesRelevantSources

Selectedarticles:

Relatedirectly to thetopic andreport resultsof empiricalresearchstudiesconducted bythe authors.

15 points

Relatedirectly to thetopic andinclude twooriginalresearchstudies.

13 points

May or maynot relatedirectly to thetopic andinclude onlyone originalresearchstudy.

11 points

Do notclearlyrelate to thetopic and donot includeoriginalresearch.

10 points

15

Annotationsummarizesthe article's

Purpose

Point orargument

Eachannotation:

Summarizesin thestudent’s ownwords—thepurpose ofthe study,sampledescription,tool(s) used,significantfindings, andpoint orargument thatthe author istrying tomake.

20 points

Summarizesin thestudent’s ownwords—thepurpose ofthe articleand point orargument thatthe author istrying tomake.

17 points

Summarizesthe purposeof the articlewith relianceonquotations.

15 points

Summarizesthe articlewith relianceonquotationsand withouta clearidentificationof purpose.

13 points

20

Annotationanalyzes

Providesrelevant

Analyzeseach

Missesrelevant detail

Missesthree or

20

1/10/23, 3:35 PMAnnotated Bibliography Rubric

Page 2 of 3https://lmscontent.embane…Bibliography_Rubric.html

quality ofeach article's

Authorcredentialsand authority

Level ofwriting

Intendedaudience

Legitimacy ofcontent

Limitations/weaknesses

Eachannotation:

detail toanalyze eachcomponent ofcriteria.

20 points

component ofcriteria butmay missrelevantdetail for onearea.

17 points

or two areasof identifiedcriteria.

15 points

more areasof identifiedcriteria.

13 points

Annotationevaluatesvalue of eacharticle to

Assignmentobjectives

Courseobjectives

Nursing ingeneral

Eachannotation:

Evaluates theusefulness orvalue of thearticle’scontent byaligningsignificantfindings orresults toassignmentand courseobjectives,and nursingin general.

25 points

Evaluates theusefulness orvalue of thearticlescontent toassignmentand courseobjectives,and nursingin general.

22 points

Misses one ortwocomponentsof evaluation.

19 points

Missesthree ormorecomponentsofevaluation.

17 points

25

Organization:

Concise

Logical

Eachannotation:

Evaluateseach article ina concise,logical flow ofideas, and iswithoutrepetition.

10 points

Evaluatestwo articleswith a logicalflow of ideasand is withoutrepetition.

8 points

Evaluates asingle articlewith errors inflow of ideas.

7 points

Evaluates asingle articlewith errorsin flow ofideassignificantlydistractingfromcontent.

10

1/10/23, 3:35 PMAnnotated Bibliography Rubric

Page 3 of 3https://lmscontent.embane…Bibliography_Rubric.html

6 points

APAReference:

Components

Punctuation

Capitalization

Italics

Spacing

Eachreference:

Meets allformatcriteria.

5 points

Has oneconsistentformat error.

4 points

Has twoconsistentformat errors.

3 points

Has morethan twoformaterrors.

2 points

5

Grammarand Spelling

Eachannotation:

Avoidsawkwardtransitions,overuse ofconjunctions,spelling,word-usage,orpunctuationerrors.

5 points

Has less thantwo grammar,word-usage,spelling, orpunctuationerrors.

4 points

Has three ormoregrammar,spelling,word-usage,orpunctuationerrors.

3 points

Hasgrammar,spelling,word-usage,andpunctuationerrors thatsignificantlydistract fromcontent.

2 points

5

Total Points 100