1/10/23, 3:35 PMAnnotated Bibliography Rubric
Page 1 of 3https://lmscontent.embane…_Bibliography_Rubric.html
Annotated Bibliography RubricNote: An appropriate scholarly resource for this assignment is a current (within five years) evidence-based practice article from a peer-reviewed journal. Review assignment instructions for any additionalrequirements such as number of annotations to include.
Annotated Bibliography Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria ExemplaryExceeds
Expectations
AdvancedMeets
Expectations
IntermediateNeeds
Improvement
NoviceInadequate
TotalPoints
IdentifiesRelevantSources
Selectedarticles:
Relatedirectly to thetopic andreport resultsof empiricalresearchstudiesconducted bythe authors.
15 points
Relatedirectly to thetopic andinclude twooriginalresearchstudies.
13 points
May or maynot relatedirectly to thetopic andinclude onlyone originalresearchstudy.
11 points
Do notclearlyrelate to thetopic and donot includeoriginalresearch.
10 points
15
Annotationsummarizesthe article's
Purpose
Point orargument
Eachannotation:
Summarizesin thestudent’s ownwords—thepurpose ofthe study,sampledescription,tool(s) used,significantfindings, andpoint orargument thatthe author istrying tomake.
20 points
Summarizesin thestudent’s ownwords—thepurpose ofthe articleand point orargument thatthe author istrying tomake.
17 points
Summarizesthe purposeof the articlewith relianceonquotations.
15 points
Summarizesthe articlewith relianceonquotationsand withouta clearidentificationof purpose.
13 points
20
Annotationanalyzes
Providesrelevant
Analyzeseach
Missesrelevant detail
Missesthree or
20
1/10/23, 3:35 PMAnnotated Bibliography Rubric
Page 2 of 3https://lmscontent.embane…Bibliography_Rubric.html
quality ofeach article's
Authorcredentialsand authority
Level ofwriting
Intendedaudience
Legitimacy ofcontent
Limitations/weaknesses
Eachannotation:
detail toanalyze eachcomponent ofcriteria.
20 points
component ofcriteria butmay missrelevantdetail for onearea.
17 points
or two areasof identifiedcriteria.
15 points
more areasof identifiedcriteria.
13 points
Annotationevaluatesvalue of eacharticle to
Assignmentobjectives
Courseobjectives
Nursing ingeneral
Eachannotation:
Evaluates theusefulness orvalue of thearticle’scontent byaligningsignificantfindings orresults toassignmentand courseobjectives,and nursingin general.
25 points
Evaluates theusefulness orvalue of thearticlescontent toassignmentand courseobjectives,and nursingin general.
22 points
Misses one ortwocomponentsof evaluation.
19 points
Missesthree ormorecomponentsofevaluation.
17 points
25
Organization:
Concise
Logical
Eachannotation:
Evaluateseach article ina concise,logical flow ofideas, and iswithoutrepetition.
10 points
Evaluatestwo articleswith a logicalflow of ideasand is withoutrepetition.
8 points
Evaluates asingle articlewith errors inflow of ideas.
7 points
Evaluates asingle articlewith errorsin flow ofideassignificantlydistractingfromcontent.
10
1/10/23, 3:35 PMAnnotated Bibliography Rubric
Page 3 of 3https://lmscontent.embane…Bibliography_Rubric.html
6 points
APAReference:
Components
Punctuation
Capitalization
Italics
Spacing
Eachreference:
Meets allformatcriteria.
5 points
Has oneconsistentformat error.
4 points
Has twoconsistentformat errors.
3 points
Has morethan twoformaterrors.
2 points
5
Grammarand Spelling
Eachannotation:
Avoidsawkwardtransitions,overuse ofconjunctions,spelling,word-usage,orpunctuationerrors.
5 points
Has less thantwo grammar,word-usage,spelling, orpunctuationerrors.
4 points
Has three ormoregrammar,spelling,word-usage,orpunctuationerrors.
3 points
Hasgrammar,spelling,word-usage,andpunctuationerrors thatsignificantlydistract fromcontent.
2 points
5
Total Points 100