Discuss the ethical principles as applied to health care and listed aboveEach State has its own court system that is very distinct from the Federal Court system.

Week One AssignmentReading Assignment:Chapter 1 Introduction to EthicsChapter 2 Contemporary Ethical DilemmasChapter 3 Health Care Ethics CommitteeChapter 4 End of Life DilemmasAssignment Questions for Week One:Physician Changed His Mind Eye Surgery?NonmaleficenceEthical principle that requires caregivers to avoid causing patients harmMedical ethics require health care providers to, “first, do no harmIn re Conroy, 464 A.2d 303, 314 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983), “the physician’s primary obligation is . . . First do no harm.”).Helping patients die violates physicians duty to save livesDistinction between killing patients & allowing them to dieDiscuss the ethical principles as applied to health care and listed aboveEach State has its own court system that is very distinct from the Federal Court system. State courts deal with health care cases on a daily basis. If youhave never heard an argument before a court before, below is a link to the case of Michael T. Vandall, M.D., Plaintiff and Appellant v. Trinity Hospitals, a corporation, and Margaret C. Nordell, M.D., which was heard by the North Dakota Supreme Court 12/11/2003. This case involved a doctor making a claim for retaliatory discharge against a hospital and the decision can be read at Vandall v. Trinity. http://www.court.state.nd.us/_court/opinions/20030255.htmGive a summary of what you have read here.What did you find most interesting?Emergency CareTwo patients in emergency department in critical condition, who gets treated first:First patient who walks through the doorYounger patientPatient likely to survivePatient who can pay for services renderedPatient with the more serious medical conditionReading Assignment:Assignment Questions for Week One:NonmaleficenceDiscuss the ethical principles as applied to health care and listed aboveEach State has its own court system that is very distinct from the Federal Court system. State courts deal with health care cases on a daily basis. If youhave never heard an argument before a court before, below is a link to the case of Michael T. Vandall, M.D., Plaintiff and Appellant v. Trinity Hospitals, a corporation, and Margaret C. Nordell, M.D., which was heard by the North Dakota Supreme Court 12/11/2003. This case involved a doctor making a claim for retaliatory discharge against a hospital and the decision can be read at Vandall v. Trinity. http://www.court.state.nd.us/_court/opinions/20030255.htmGive a summary of what you have read here.What did you find most interesting?Emergency CareTwo patients in emergency department in critical condition, who gets treated first:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.