Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
This criterion is linked to
a Learning Outcome
Content/ Comprehension
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
Post demonstrates depth
of understanding of
course content; Addresses
discussion prompt
completely; offers clear
point of view and detail
15 to >10.0 pts
Satisfactory
Post demonstrates adequate
depth of understanding, but
does not address all of
discussion prompt; point of
view is somewhat unclear
and detail is limited
10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Post does not
demonstrate depth of
understanding of
course content;
Discussion prompt is
minimally addressed;
Point of view is
unclear and detail is
under-developed
20
This criterion is linked to
a Learning Outcome
Engagement/ Classroom
Interaction (One to two
response posts, please
refer to the week's
discussion for specific
requirements)
20 to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Submits required number
of response posts;
Responses extend the
discussion by making
connections, relating to
others' ideas and adding
supporting detail
14 to >9.0 pts
Satisfactory
Submits required number
or response posts; Some
connections are made with
relevant explanation and
detail
9 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Responses are not
submitted; Responses
are generic, limited, do
not extend the
discussion or add
detail
20
This criterion is linked to
a Learning Outcome
Timeliness
10 pts
Excellent
Submits initial post by
deadline
4 pts
Satisfactory
Submits initial post one to
three days late(after
Wednesday)
0 pts
Needs Improvement
Submits initial post 4
days late(after
Sunday)
10
This criterion is linked to
a Learning Outcome
Spelling/
Grammar/Mechanics
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Posts have 0-1 spelling or
grammatical errors;
Properly cites work in
APA format where
required
8 to >5.0 pts
Satisfactory
Posts have 2-3 spelling or
grammatical errors; Cites
work in APA format where
required with few errors
5 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Posts have 3 or more
spelling or
grammatical errors;
Does not cite work
where required
10
Total Points 60
