|
85 to >76.0 pts
Excellent
Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources…. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters' prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
76 to >67.0 pts
Good
Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by 2 or more credible sources…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters' prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
67 to >59.0 pts
Fair
Responses are on topic and may have some depth…. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Presenters' prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed.
|
59 to >0 pts
Poor
Responses may not be on topic and lack depth…. No credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication…. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing.
|
