|
NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:· Planning and requirements definition· Analysis· Design of the new system· Implementation· Post-implementation support
|
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis· Design of the new system
|
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Implementation· Post-implementation support
|
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
